Thursday, December 29, 2016
Anthony Bruno Retweeted Fredric U. Dicker And I thought Soros was damaging our country.... wrong I was!! Brings to mind the story....."Let George Do it!"
Feedback appreciated. Feel free to enter
in comments section below, or email,
ajbruno14@gmail.com
"Point of View" blog
http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
Wednesday, December 28, 2016
A loss we all share, even if we don't realize it
A few days ago it was reported a Russian plane went down over
the Black Sea, with a lose of 92 lives. Like many others I thought
it was a terrorist attack.
But, I stopped pondering if it was an attack or some other cause
when I learned on the plane was the "Alexandrov Ensemble", the
country's national choir that was traveling to perform a concert.
All of a sudden all the thoughts of why the crash occurred
were not important. Good people traveling to bring pleasure
to others are now gone!
At a time some seek advantages playing groups and even
countries against one another, this shocking event awaken
our own humanity, albeit only briefly, before it goes back
into a deep slumber of indifference.
into a deep slumber of indifference.
The victims families will never get over their lose, nor
fail to remember each year on the date the crash occurred.
However, we are all left a remembrance to always treasure,
the special gift this choir gave to so many.
If you were not aware of the plane crash, take a moment to
listen to what was lost , a tribute to our country by the
"Alexandrov Ensemble".Feedback appreciated. Feel free to enter in comments section below, or email, ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
Tuesday, December 27, 2016
The Legacy of the Obama Presidency
As the Obama presidency entered the final year of his
two terms, it was hard to avoid reports of what would
be his 'legacy'.
Personally, I never gave a thought to any president's
legacy. Its hollow blather to fill pages of newspapers
and discussions among presidential historians.
It is the rare citizen who actually cares about the
legacy of anyone, other than maybe himself.
But, if there is an insistence to approach the topic,
maybe we should, with one caveat, be objective!
Unlike those into legacy creations who most often
view their subjects from partisan, either sugar
coated or hyper critical, perspectives I'll offer
my view based on the state of issues important to
our nation.
In 2008 candidate Obama sent a signal which I picked
up on my political antenna, he would "transform"
our nation, without offering exactly what this meant.
We knew his credentials were paper thin, including
being a community organizer, bringing the vision of
Al Sharpton, not a title I easily embraced.
But, our country elected him and many went gaga over
the 'first' Black president, never concerned about his
lack of experience or meaningful accomplishments, nor
even factoring in the enormity of the job.
One of the very first things President Obama did was undo
the work of President Bush's Justice Dept. which decided
to prosecute the New Black Panther Party over its blatant
voter intimidation in Philadelphia during the 2008 election.
I am not sure how others viewed this decision, but in the
eight years of observing what the Justice Dept. has become,
this initial decision telegraphed to anyone paying attention
and worse, Justice employees, how 'unjust' it would be run.
Justice was not alone, I have seen eight years of malfeasance
throughout many agencies including the IRS, HHS, State, VA,
CIA and FBI.
Some officials even felt compelled to take the Fifth Amendment
when testifying before Congress rather than answering questions,
odd coming from people who worked for the man who campaigned he
would have the "most transparent" administration of any president,
which has become a comical throwaway line by many politicians.
Several of Obama's post election decisions demonstrate how little
regard he has for seamlessly transitioning Donald Trump into
the presidency.
First, consider some of Trump's campaign promises and steps
Obama has taken to undermine them.
Begin with the question of refugees coming into our country
unvetted. With over 100,000 already taking residence here,
which Trump has said would end, Obama brought in thousands
more in the last two months.
Move to the matter of energy production which Trump wants to
expand. President Obama has decided to ban Arctic drilling,
a second slap in the face of our new president.
Lastly, we see the manner in which President Obama sidestepped
the UN resolution to halt Israel from building more settlements,
a first for our country. Obama knows Trump's stand on Israel and
its right to self rule, yet he preferred to create another matter the
new president must deal with.
Unlike President Bush who left Obama a stable Iraq and addressed
the financial crisis with the first stimulus, Trump will not be as
fortunate.
National debt, annual deficits, one half Arab states in chaos,
terrorism blanketing the planet, nearly a dozen attacks here in
the United States, Europe under siege by Muslim designs, Iran
closer to a nuclear adversary than ever before, China flexing
its muscles in the South Pacific and Putin up to "old Soviet
tricks" leaves plenty on the new president's plate.
Lastly, the state of poor communities throughout our country
which only Donald Trump seems to care about. The divide from
law enforcement, increased crime, drug cartels in most cities
and race baiting by anarchists.
Let others offer their fanciful legacy of President Obama, mine
is based on the state of our nation and the world. Not much to
be proud of!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
two terms, it was hard to avoid reports of what would
be his 'legacy'.
Personally, I never gave a thought to any president's
legacy. Its hollow blather to fill pages of newspapers
and discussions among presidential historians.
It is the rare citizen who actually cares about the
legacy of anyone, other than maybe himself.
But, if there is an insistence to approach the topic,
maybe we should, with one caveat, be objective!
Unlike those into legacy creations who most often
view their subjects from partisan, either sugar
coated or hyper critical, perspectives I'll offer
my view based on the state of issues important to
our nation.
In 2008 candidate Obama sent a signal which I picked
up on my political antenna, he would "transform"
our nation, without offering exactly what this meant.
We knew his credentials were paper thin, including
being a community organizer, bringing the vision of
Al Sharpton, not a title I easily embraced.
But, our country elected him and many went gaga over
the 'first' Black president, never concerned about his
lack of experience or meaningful accomplishments, nor
even factoring in the enormity of the job.
One of the very first things President Obama did was undo
the work of President Bush's Justice Dept. which decided
to prosecute the New Black Panther Party over its blatant
voter intimidation in Philadelphia during the 2008 election.
I am not sure how others viewed this decision, but in the
eight years of observing what the Justice Dept. has become,
this initial decision telegraphed to anyone paying attention
and worse, Justice employees, how 'unjust' it would be run.
Justice was not alone, I have seen eight years of malfeasance
throughout many agencies including the IRS, HHS, State, VA,
CIA and FBI.
Some officials even felt compelled to take the Fifth Amendment
when testifying before Congress rather than answering questions,
odd coming from people who worked for the man who campaigned he
would have the "most transparent" administration of any president,
which has become a comical throwaway line by many politicians.
Several of Obama's post election decisions demonstrate how little
regard he has for seamlessly transitioning Donald Trump into
the presidency.
First, consider some of Trump's campaign promises and steps
Obama has taken to undermine them.
Begin with the question of refugees coming into our country
unvetted. With over 100,000 already taking residence here,
which Trump has said would end, Obama brought in thousands
more in the last two months.
Move to the matter of energy production which Trump wants to
expand. President Obama has decided to ban Arctic drilling,
a second slap in the face of our new president.
Lastly, we see the manner in which President Obama sidestepped
the UN resolution to halt Israel from building more settlements,
a first for our country. Obama knows Trump's stand on Israel and
its right to self rule, yet he preferred to create another matter the
new president must deal with.
Unlike President Bush who left Obama a stable Iraq and addressed
the financial crisis with the first stimulus, Trump will not be as
fortunate.
National debt, annual deficits, one half Arab states in chaos,
terrorism blanketing the planet, nearly a dozen attacks here in
the United States, Europe under siege by Muslim designs, Iran
closer to a nuclear adversary than ever before, China flexing
its muscles in the South Pacific and Putin up to "old Soviet
tricks" leaves plenty on the new president's plate.
Lastly, the state of poor communities throughout our country
which only Donald Trump seems to care about. The divide from
law enforcement, increased crime, drug cartels in most cities
and race baiting by anarchists.
Let others offer their fanciful legacy of President Obama, mine
is based on the state of our nation and the world. Not much to
be proud of!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
Monday, December 26, 2016
The "Relentless Pursuit" to Destroy the Electoral College
Don't expect the effort to end the reliance on the Electoral College
to be silenced after Donald Trump amassed the required number
of votes to win the presidency.
It will continue, as the "relentless pursuit" of a pure democracy
where majority rules determines how we select the our president.
Those who cherish the republic understand a true democracy will
often result in false representation. We know the intent of our
Founders; assure every state receives a proportional voice, not
defer to desires of the greatest number of citizens.
But, even as this election fades in the memory of most, this "relentless
pursuit" will continue, corrosively done, especially in universities, that
promote 'one person, one vote' without considering what is at risk.
If not effectively combated Congress will once again submit and
eliminate the only remaining protection for states to have a voice.
In 1913 Congress and the states took their first misstep when the
17th Amendment was passed and ratified, allowing members of
the Senate to be elected by citizens of each state. rather than state
legislatures.
What Congress may not have realized in 1913 was tantamount to
fracturing the important role states play in American governance.
What the states unwittingly allowed was end the crucial power each
state held, joint selection of its members of Congress, House members
by the people, Senate members by elected legislators!
Right now there is a serious discussion about eliminating the electoral
college, a discussion more about political parties interests, not those
of equal 'partners', the states and citizens, which the electoral system
provides.
To ensure state interests are not fully terminated and replaced by the
will, which can become the "tyranny", of the majority Congress must
repeal the 17th Amendment and return to allowing state legislatures
determine who should serve in the US Senate!
Unfortunately, I have read little about repealing the 17th Amendment.
The mood of the country is going in the other direction, as there is
little interest in protecting electoral systems by its defenders.
But, those in "relentless pursuit" will continue to fight for "one person,
one vote" until all resistance is defeated.
And given the disinterest of most politicians the electoral vote will end,
states more dependent and the will of the majority will govern!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
to be silenced after Donald Trump amassed the required number
of votes to win the presidency.
It will continue, as the "relentless pursuit" of a pure democracy
where majority rules determines how we select the our president.
Those who cherish the republic understand a true democracy will
often result in false representation. We know the intent of our
Founders; assure every state receives a proportional voice, not
defer to desires of the greatest number of citizens.
But, even as this election fades in the memory of most, this "relentless
pursuit" will continue, corrosively done, especially in universities, that
promote 'one person, one vote' without considering what is at risk.
If not effectively combated Congress will once again submit and
eliminate the only remaining protection for states to have a voice.
In 1913 Congress and the states took their first misstep when the
17th Amendment was passed and ratified, allowing members of
the Senate to be elected by citizens of each state. rather than state
legislatures.
What Congress may not have realized in 1913 was tantamount to
fracturing the important role states play in American governance.
What the states unwittingly allowed was end the crucial power each
state held, joint selection of its members of Congress, House members
by the people, Senate members by elected legislators!
Right now there is a serious discussion about eliminating the electoral
college, a discussion more about political parties interests, not those
of equal 'partners', the states and citizens, which the electoral system
provides.
To ensure state interests are not fully terminated and replaced by the
will, which can become the "tyranny", of the majority Congress must
repeal the 17th Amendment and return to allowing state legislatures
determine who should serve in the US Senate!
Unfortunately, I have read little about repealing the 17th Amendment.
The mood of the country is going in the other direction, as there is
little interest in protecting electoral systems by its defenders.
But, those in "relentless pursuit" will continue to fight for "one person,
one vote" until all resistance is defeated.
And given the disinterest of most politicians the electoral vote will end,
states more dependent and the will of the majority will govern!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
Thursday, December 22, 2016
Donald Trump's "New World Order"
When I hear the term "new world order" I think immediately of former
president George HW Bush who included it in a 1990 speech before
Congress, occurring on an interesting date, Sept. 11th, eleven years before
an attack in the United States announced to the world, terrorism will
become dominate player in whatever "order" results.
"Out of these troubled times, our objective, 'a New World Order',
can emerge. Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a
world quite different from the one we have known. "
President George Bush, Sept. 11, 1990
of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and
the balance of power.
As 9/11, 2001 demonstrated it would not take a nuclear arms race to
alter the balance of power.
This 'new world order' is an ideological notion of global governance ,
based by new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address
worldwide problems beyond the capacity of individual nation-states
to solve.
As appealing as this sounds caution is needed, "global governance"
silences the voices of sovereign nation states allowing governing by
global 'consensus', not the people!
At the time there was no clamor or concern by the American people,
perhaps for two understandable reasons, we have had enough.
First, it had been forty five years since the Cold War was hatched
by the end of World War II as the two winners foolishly became
adversaries, each with differing forms of governance and global desires.
Second, nearly fifty years have put us in a "comfort zone", especially
with the fall of the Soviet Union and the agreement both world powers
would reduce the number of nuclear weapons.
An arms race meant there would be no winner, but two losers, costing the
desires of both countries people for true agreement or "detente".
But, such hopes cannot occur as the world is percolating, not only with the
threat of terrorist attacks around the world and desires of two formidable
powers, China and Russia, that have become emboldened especially in the
eight years Obama has been our president.
No need to review how we arrive at this precarious point. But, Trump
already knows he must boldly take on the challenge as Ronald Reagan
did nearly forty years earlier.
We can no longer spend the 'peace dividend' from the fall of the Soviet
Union and continue to use it for domestic services. At that time this
seemed like the right thing to do. But also "at the time" we took our eye
off the sleeping giant in Asia, China, that took the best of capitalism,
without loosening the grip of Communism, to become the second
strongest economic power in the world, and amassed a navy capable
to rule the South Pacific.
Also, the fall of the Soviet Union that led to "detente" did not lead to
peaceful coexistence. In fact, Russia today may even be stronger as it is
not saddled with the burden of satellite states of Eastern Europe requiring
force to restrain. Now, Russia can focus on Putin's desires visible for all
to see, a presence in the Middle East for the first time!
This is the true 'new world order' President Trump must face. China,
Russia, worldwide terrorism and the Middle East as unstable it was after
the Shah of Iran fell from power!
What will Trump do? We know one thing, Trump is committed to destroy
ISIS. Surprisingly, he may even go into battle with powerful ally, Russia.
Both Trump and Putin want stability in the Middle East which can only be
done when every terrorist threat is destroyed!
Trump has already committed to rebuild the US military which is now
about one-half what it was in 2000 as defense funding cuts became
the 'peace dividend' and spent elsewhere.
This increase in military spending will be the first major spending since
Reagan and include over 200,000 military personnel and rebuilding
our depleted Navy to become a presence in the South Pacific so China
understands we will not abandon our allies.
This may not be the 'new world order' the globalists envisioned but its
one that requires WE ensure there is order to go hand in hand with peace!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
president George HW Bush who included it in a 1990 speech before
Congress, occurring on an interesting date, Sept. 11th, eleven years before
an attack in the United States announced to the world, terrorism will
become dominate player in whatever "order" results.
"Out of these troubled times, our objective, 'a New World Order',
can emerge. Today, that new world is struggling to be born, a
world quite different from the one we have known. "
President George Bush, Sept. 11, 1990
The term "new world order" has been used to refer to any new period
of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and
the balance of power.
As 9/11, 2001 demonstrated it would not take a nuclear arms race to
alter the balance of power.
This 'new world order' is an ideological notion of global governance ,
based by new collective efforts to identify, understand, or address
worldwide problems beyond the capacity of individual nation-states
to solve.
As appealing as this sounds caution is needed, "global governance"
silences the voices of sovereign nation states allowing governing by
global 'consensus', not the people!
At the time there was no clamor or concern by the American people,
perhaps for two understandable reasons, we have had enough.
First, it had been forty five years since the Cold War was hatched
by the end of World War II as the two winners foolishly became
adversaries, each with differing forms of governance and global desires.
Second, nearly fifty years have put us in a "comfort zone", especially
with the fall of the Soviet Union and the agreement both world powers
would reduce the number of nuclear weapons.
An arms race meant there would be no winner, but two losers, costing the
desires of both countries people for true agreement or "detente".
But, such hopes cannot occur as the world is percolating, not only with the
threat of terrorist attacks around the world and desires of two formidable
powers, China and Russia, that have become emboldened especially in the
eight years Obama has been our president.
No need to review how we arrive at this precarious point. But, Trump
already knows he must boldly take on the challenge as Ronald Reagan
did nearly forty years earlier.
We can no longer spend the 'peace dividend' from the fall of the Soviet
Union and continue to use it for domestic services. At that time this
seemed like the right thing to do. But also "at the time" we took our eye
off the sleeping giant in Asia, China, that took the best of capitalism,
without loosening the grip of Communism, to become the second
strongest economic power in the world, and amassed a navy capable
to rule the South Pacific.
Also, the fall of the Soviet Union that led to "detente" did not lead to
peaceful coexistence. In fact, Russia today may even be stronger as it is
not saddled with the burden of satellite states of Eastern Europe requiring
force to restrain. Now, Russia can focus on Putin's desires visible for all
to see, a presence in the Middle East for the first time!
This is the true 'new world order' President Trump must face. China,
Russia, worldwide terrorism and the Middle East as unstable it was after
the Shah of Iran fell from power!
What will Trump do? We know one thing, Trump is committed to destroy
ISIS. Surprisingly, he may even go into battle with powerful ally, Russia.
Both Trump and Putin want stability in the Middle East which can only be
done when every terrorist threat is destroyed!
Trump has already committed to rebuild the US military which is now
about one-half what it was in 2000 as defense funding cuts became
the 'peace dividend' and spent elsewhere.
This increase in military spending will be the first major spending since
Reagan and include over 200,000 military personnel and rebuilding
our depleted Navy to become a presence in the South Pacific so China
understands we will not abandon our allies.
This may not be the 'new world order' the globalists envisioned but its
one that requires WE ensure there is order to go hand in hand with peace!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
Saturday, December 17, 2016
Giving "voice" to the 'Forgotten Americans"
Thanks to the most unorthodox candidate battling against
the political and media establishments the American people
have finally gotten to see for themselves the embodiment
of a biased and perhaps corrupt system which influences
who we elect.
We also see once again how divided our country is as the
West Coast and Northeast were solidly supporting Hillary
Clinton while the heartland, the smaller, less populated
states voted for Donald Trump.
Much is being made about Hillary receiving more votes, but
not enough to reach the required electoral count of 270,
as Trump reached 306.
But, it is no coincidence the areas where Hillary was most
successful are the media centers in our country where major
newspapers are influential.
As we look to the major cities we find the New York Times,
Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, San
Francisco Chronicle, Boston Globe and even the national
USA Today, all endorsed Hillary Clinton.
This parallels the voting pattern of the American people
as the smaller states, with smaller circulation newspapers
provided Trump his victory.
As we begin the Trump Administration it appears the White
House press room will look as it does now under President
Obama, even with Trump's criticism of the media. Trump
will continue to give prominent seating to his harshest
critics as George Bush did leading to the same bias at
daily press briefings and press conferences.
Well, this need not be so, not with the most "unorthodox"
president in the White House.
President Trump should dramatically re-prioritize which media
receives credentials, ensuring newspapers of the heartland
are equally represented.
President Trump should invite the most equally "unorthodox"
media to ensure the voters in smaller states, the ones who
gave him the victory have as much representation in the White
House as the major newspapers have.
This decision would also give a life line to smaller newspapers
who are struggling to survive.
Newspapers from Nashville, Oklahoma City, Boise, St. Louis,
Louisville, Charleston, Birmingham, Al, and many of the
dozens of states he won need to have equal access.
Why should the small papers, scattered across the country,
who know the "Trump voter" the best not be allowed to ask
the questions on their readers minds when we know the major
newspapers intend is to play "gotcha" for their own purposes?
Its only right the first non-establishment president should
communicate directly to the long ignored non-establishment media!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
the political and media establishments the American people
have finally gotten to see for themselves the embodiment
of a biased and perhaps corrupt system which influences
who we elect.
We also see once again how divided our country is as the
West Coast and Northeast were solidly supporting Hillary
Clinton while the heartland, the smaller, less populated
states voted for Donald Trump.
Much is being made about Hillary receiving more votes, but
not enough to reach the required electoral count of 270,
as Trump reached 306.
But, it is no coincidence the areas where Hillary was most
successful are the media centers in our country where major
newspapers are influential.
As we look to the major cities we find the New York Times,
Washington Post, Chicago Tribune, Los Angeles Times, San
Francisco Chronicle, Boston Globe and even the national
USA Today, all endorsed Hillary Clinton.
This parallels the voting pattern of the American people
as the smaller states, with smaller circulation newspapers
provided Trump his victory.
As we begin the Trump Administration it appears the White
House press room will look as it does now under President
Obama, even with Trump's criticism of the media. Trump
will continue to give prominent seating to his harshest
critics as George Bush did leading to the same bias at
daily press briefings and press conferences.
Well, this need not be so, not with the most "unorthodox"
president in the White House.
President Trump should dramatically re-prioritize which media
receives credentials, ensuring newspapers of the heartland
are equally represented.
President Trump should invite the most equally "unorthodox"
media to ensure the voters in smaller states, the ones who
gave him the victory have as much representation in the White
House as the major newspapers have.
This decision would also give a life line to smaller newspapers
who are struggling to survive.
Newspapers from Nashville, Oklahoma City, Boise, St. Louis,
Louisville, Charleston, Birmingham, Al, and many of the
dozens of states he won need to have equal access.
Why should the small papers, scattered across the country,
who know the "Trump voter" the best not be allowed to ask
the questions on their readers minds when we know the major
newspapers intend is to play "gotcha" for their own purposes?
Its only right the first non-establishment president should
communicate directly to the long ignored non-establishment media!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
The "snowflakes" among us!
A term has become common, "snowflakes", used to describe an overly
sensitive person, incapable of dealing with any opinions that differ
from their own. Such people can often be seen congregating in "safe
zones" on college campuses.
sensitive person, incapable of dealing with any opinions that differ
from their own. Such people can often be seen congregating in "safe
zones" on college campuses.
To an older generation whose lives were molded by real life experiences
its hard to understand why so many, mostly young people, fall victim to
this malady.
its hard to understand why so many, mostly young people, fall victim to
this malady.
But, being a 'snowflake' is not limited to the young, this condition
can also be found in faculty lounges, where tenured professors seek
solitude when it appears their desires or beliefs are threatened.
Oddly, these "snowflakes" do not melt when the media is around. They
find the courage to protest when the cameras are running and even
violently engage those foolish enough to attempt to debate them!
can also be found in faculty lounges, where tenured professors seek
solitude when it appears their desires or beliefs are threatened.
Oddly, these "snowflakes" do not melt when the media is around. They
find the courage to protest when the cameras are running and even
violently engage those foolish enough to attempt to debate them!
The best statement I heard made about this snowflake generation,
"could or even would these 18-25 year olds ever scale the hills of
Normandy?" Dare I say, most wouldn't even know the significance
of Normandy in the battle to save France from Hitler!
"could or even would these 18-25 year olds ever scale the hills of
Normandy?" Dare I say, most wouldn't even know the significance
of Normandy in the battle to save France from Hitler!
Those of us who chuckled when we saw disappointed voters became
unhinged after Donald Trump won the election may have also found it
disappointing so many people really believe the election of one man
or woman, if Hillary won, could actually destroy our great nation.
unhinged after Donald Trump won the election may have also found it
disappointing so many people really believe the election of one man
or woman, if Hillary won, could actually destroy our great nation.
But, thanks to a public education system that replaced teaching United
States history with jaded professorial opinions, this is not surprising.
States history with jaded professorial opinions, this is not surprising.
The contagion of "snowflake-itus" is not limited to the young, highly
educated or political partisans. It can been found even in Hollywood
where celebrities reside protected by the walls of multi-million dollar
estates and 'red carpet' walkways where their adoring fans know, they
can look, but can not touch!
educated or political partisans. It can been found even in Hollywood
where celebrities reside protected by the walls of multi-million dollar
estates and 'red carpet' walkways where their adoring fans know, they
can look, but can not touch!
These actors and actresses on rare occasions expose themselves to the
public, making appearances to promote their latest movie, project or
cause. Many even transform themselves into the fawning groupies when
like minded politicians such as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama come
to town, usually with a self-serving motive, such as seeking donations.
Some celebrities, who are easily transformed into publicity whores even
proclaim they would "leave the country" if an election doesn't go their
way. This cyclical election year joke is laughed at, as none ever do.
And for good reason, with all their complaints, they know there is no
place better to live.
For the Hollywood star who seriously considers leaving, the decision
is never made by an election, its after consulting an accountant!!!
Interestingly, even the financial benefit of departing becomes a moot,
once Donald Trump lowers everyone's taxes as he campaigned he would.
Maybe enough to finance their private jets!
public, making appearances to promote their latest movie, project or
cause. Many even transform themselves into the fawning groupies when
like minded politicians such as Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama come
to town, usually with a self-serving motive, such as seeking donations.
Some celebrities, who are easily transformed into publicity whores even
proclaim they would "leave the country" if an election doesn't go their
way. This cyclical election year joke is laughed at, as none ever do.
And for good reason, with all their complaints, they know there is no
place better to live.
For the Hollywood star who seriously considers leaving, the decision
is never made by an election, its after consulting an accountant!!!
Interestingly, even the financial benefit of departing becomes a moot,
once Donald Trump lowers everyone's taxes as he campaigned he would.
Maybe enough to finance their private jets!
Please add feedback in comments section below, or email ajbruno14@gmail.com "Point of View" blog http://ajbruno14.blogspot.com/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)