While the media is focusing on the immediate, the protest of a Donald Trump
rally in Chicago, it failed to view this protest in broader context and what it
actually means to our nation.
As so often happens what appears to be the "obvious" isn't. As expected the
rally in Chicago, it failed to view this protest in broader context and what it
actually means to our nation.
As so often happens what appears to be the "obvious" isn't. As expected the
media capitalized on the protest using it to 'prove' it was Trump's doing.
The outrage against Trump reminded me of what Chicago mayor Rahm
The outrage against Trump reminded me of what Chicago mayor Rahm
Emanuel once said, "Never let a serious crisis go to waste", calling it an
opportunity! Trump's critics were all too eager to weaken his candidacy.
To objectively evaluate what happened in Chicago this week, we must step
To objectively evaluate what happened in Chicago this week, we must step
back, about five years, to Sept. 17, 2011, to clearly see with 20-20 hindsight
what began than and continues today, ongoing attempts to dismantle American
institutions.
2011 was the year "Occupy Wall St." was born. Its 'parent' is Left Wing group
Move On.org, which has been making political, but partisan, mischief since
2000. Its a Democrat Party front group, but presents itself as grass roots issues
agent of change.
Occupy Wall St., to be successful, had to go beyond the boundaries of civil
disobedience to make front page news. It engaged using in-your-face protests,
even going to the homes of Wall St. executives to intimidate them. Its selectivity
was telling, it focused attention solely on Wall St. not its benefactor, the govt.
itself, for it this was done it would bring to light the cozy relationship between
Wall St. and govt., which is verboten, a political no-no! An omission currently
shared with Bernie Sanders!
More recently, in 2013 another Left Wing group, "Black Lives Matter" gained
national prominence, protesting across the country to incite crowds against law
enforcement that contributed to over a dozen officers murdered. Black Lives
Matter agenda is obvious, it wants to beat down cops, their morale, and their
desire to protect the public, which includes many who even despise them. Again,
the selectivity is obvious, no protests over the carnage in urban communities of
innocent citizens. How can this group be considered credible or taken seriously?
We are told these are two groups came about "spontaneously". The similarity is
worth noting, both desire the destruction of vital elements of civil behavior, the
engine of our economy and law enforcement.
The protest of Trump in Chicago may be the next page of Democrat Party play
book, destroy unacceptable political dissent.
Those approaching such radical protests as isolated incidents are fooling themselves.
They groups are well organized, well funded and professionally managed, using angry
foils paid to travel across the country to march for the "cause".
This "crisis" could also be an opportunity to destroy the anarchists behind the protests!
2011 was the year "Occupy Wall St." was born. Its 'parent' is Left Wing group
Move On.org, which has been making political, but partisan, mischief since
2000. Its a Democrat Party front group, but presents itself as grass roots issues
agent of change.
Occupy Wall St., to be successful, had to go beyond the boundaries of civil
disobedience to make front page news. It engaged using in-your-face protests,
even going to the homes of Wall St. executives to intimidate them. Its selectivity
was telling, it focused attention solely on Wall St. not its benefactor, the govt.
itself, for it this was done it would bring to light the cozy relationship between
Wall St. and govt., which is verboten, a political no-no! An omission currently
shared with Bernie Sanders!
More recently, in 2013 another Left Wing group, "Black Lives Matter" gained
national prominence, protesting across the country to incite crowds against law
enforcement that contributed to over a dozen officers murdered. Black Lives
Matter agenda is obvious, it wants to beat down cops, their morale, and their
desire to protect the public, which includes many who even despise them. Again,
the selectivity is obvious, no protests over the carnage in urban communities of
innocent citizens. How can this group be considered credible or taken seriously?
We are told these are two groups came about "spontaneously". The similarity is
worth noting, both desire the destruction of vital elements of civil behavior, the
engine of our economy and law enforcement.
The protest of Trump in Chicago may be the next page of Democrat Party play
book, destroy unacceptable political dissent.
Those approaching such radical protests as isolated incidents are fooling themselves.
They groups are well organized, well funded and professionally managed, using angry
foils paid to travel across the country to march for the "cause".
This "crisis" could also be an opportunity to destroy the anarchists behind the protests!
No comments:
Post a Comment